Validity and Reliability are foundational Trustworthiness Characteristics in the NIST AI RMF, focusing on the AI system's core functional performance. Validity ensures the system achieves its intended purpose accurately, while Reliability ensures it delivers consistent, dependable results over time and across conditions.

These characteristics address the fundamental question: "Does the system work correctly and dependably?" Validity is about correctness—whether the system's predictions, classifications, or generations are right for the given task. Reliability is about stability, whether the system can be counted on to perform at that level of correctness repeatedly, without unexpected degradation or erratic behavior. A system can be reliable but not valid (consistently wrong) or temporarily valid but unreliable (accurate only sporadically). For high-stakes applications, both high validity and high reliability are non-negotiable prerequisites for safe and effective deployment.

Achieving and demonstrating validity and reliability involves rigorous, ongoing evaluation:

Validation Testing: Conducting comprehensive testing against a ground-truth dataset that is representative of the operational environment to measure key accuracy metrics (e.g., precision, recall, F1 score, MAE) and confirm the system meets its performance specifications.

Reliability & Stress Testing: Assessing performance consistency under varying loads, input variations, and edge cases, and over extended operational periods to detect instability, memory leaks, or performance decay.

Robustness Evaluation: Testing the system's performance in the face of noisy, incomplete, or out-of-distribution data to ensure it degrades gracefully rather than failing catastrophically.

Continuous Performance Monitoring: Implementing production monitoring to track validity and reliability metrics in real-time, establishing alert thresholds for performance drift that triggers investigation and retraining.

Regulatory Context: These characteristics are central to the "accuracy, robustness, and cybersecurity" requirements for high-risk AI systems under the EU AI Act (Article 15). They form the basis of the performance evaluation required for conformity assessment (Annex VII) and are essential for effective post-market monitoring (Article 61). They also align with core quality management principles in ISO/IEC 42001.

Foundation of User Trust: Validity and reliability are the bedrock of practical trust. If users cannot depend on an AI system to perform its job correctly and consistently, they will not adopt it, and its deployment could pose active safety risks. Demonstrable validity and reliability are often the minimum entry criteria for regulatory approval and market acceptance in critical domains.

‍